In an effort to meet the local rising energy demand and aspiring to be a regional energy hub, Ethiopia has made a huge public investment to its power infrastructures, more so to the power generation. Beyond that it allowed private sector, both foreign and local, participation in generating power and selling to the state’s power company and utility. Following that Ethiopia has witnessed so much of an interest of the private sector to be engaged in the generation sector although the level of participation is still low. Indeed, leaving the question of price of power aside, generating sufficient capacity to drive the ever rising demand expected to come from the growth in the economy, specifically from the manufacturing sector, and the expansion of the national grid is a daunting task to the country.
It is fair to say that there has also
been a considerable high voltage transmission lines construction taking place
mainly linking the power plants to the main substations.
Nevertheless, without
the parallel development of the distribution infrastructures, achieving the
intended goals will likely be too far.
Some
countries experiences suggest that the condition of the power distribution network
in a country highly correlates to the level of the private sector participation
in the overall power sector investment.
If the distribution sector is in good condition, the private sector is
encouraged to make an investment in the entire power sector and vise- versa. The
biggest gap in private sector involvement in the developing countries where
Ethiopia is one of the best examples is in the power distribution sector.
Strangely, the power distribution sector in
Ethiopia and other many developing countries does not get as much attention as
the generation and transmission did even if there exist the greatest potential
for improvement and benefits to the countries. It is in the distribution sector
where there are high levels of loses; low levels of collections; poor system
maintenance and reliability; low level of electrification; and low levels of
customer inputs. These are all shortcomings that could be alleviated through
proper distribution sector reforms mainly by allowing the private sector
participation.
What is even more fundamental, in increasing the effectiveness
and efficiency of the distribution sector is that it can greatly strengthen the
financial viability of the entire power sector- generation, transmission and distribution
alike. If the distribution companies become financially stable and profitable,
they will be in a better position to pay for the power from the many
independent power producers, and the country will be able to negotiate short
and long term contracts of the power supply in general. If this is the case, independent
power producers, IPPs, may no longer require government or third party
guaranties to invest subsequently minimizing the associated transaction costs and
increasing the attractiveness of the sector for investment. In other words,
increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of the distribution sector will
ensure the private sector that there is a positive cash flow in the
industry.
If the true
benefit of the private sector is to be tapped in to for the betterment of the
distribution sector, however, the good intentions of the policy objectives
should be translated in to action. It is obvious that the power infrastructure
naturally requires a lot of capital to be mobilized upfront which will make
both public and private resources short to meet demand. One way to pool
domestic capital for investment in the distribution sector or otherwise in the
entire sector is through the realization of domestic stock markets. In addition
to mobilizing more capital for more investment in the power sector,
establishing domestic stock markets has a double advantage of shielding the
country from the currency risk as the capital mobilized will be in local
currency.
Yes, it is
understandable that putting stock markets in to action and allowing the private
sector to participate in the investment of the power distribution sector will
be a long process but at least it could be possible to make improvements as it
is through proper incentives and reforms, as much as it is done in the
generation sector and paving the way in to the future, stepwise.
The Achilles
heel now in the country may be how to reach the many people who don’t have
access to clean and modern energy, and worse how to make the available power
reliable. Soon or later and as the consumers become empowered, however, the
demand for an efficient and competitive power will emerge. The current power
and energy policies in the country are way behind to sufficiently guide the way
towards the competitive power sector (I will highlight competitive power and
the road to it in my next article). The existing monopoly of the state utility
and the power company, and also the emerging independent power producers, IPPs,
unless thoroughly considered, are binding constraints to the development of
competitiveness in the power sector in the country in the long run.
No comments:
Post a Comment